CBGM Bibliography

The following are publications on and interactions with the CBGM, with some overlap with essays on the ECM. Criterion for inclusion in the list below is at least a paragraph of discussion of the CBGM. The following publications may be divided into three categories. (1) Those written in 2017 or prior. ECM Acts was published in 2017 which used a new CBGM interface, and Tommy Wasserman and Peter Gurry’s A New Approach, was also published in 2017. Since then, there has been more clarification on how the method works. (2) Those that present extended analyses evaluating the CBGM or applying it in the author’s assessment of witnesses. (3) Those that offer only a relatively brief description of the CBGM without extensive critical engagement.

2017 and Prior

Aland, Barbara. “A New Instrument and Method for Evaluating the Total Manuscript Tradition of the New Testament.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1985 bis 1987, 33–50. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1988.

Aland, Barbara. “Welche Rolle spielen Textkritik und Textgeschichte für das Verständnis des Neuen Testaments? Frühe Leserperspektiven.” NTS 52, no. 3 (2006): 303–318.

Alexanderson, Bengt. Problems in the New Testament: Old Manuscripts and Papyri, the New Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM) and the Editio Critica Maior (ECM). Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum et Litterarum Gothoburgensis, Humaniora 48. Göteborg: Göteborg, 2014.

Blumenthal, Christian. “Es wird aber kommen der Tag des Herrn”: Eine textkritische Studie zu 2Petr 3,10. Bonner Biblische Beiträge 154. Hamburg: Philo, 2007.

Bordalejo, Barbara. “The Genealogy of Texts: Manuscript Traditions and Textual Traditions.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities31, no. 3 (2016): 563–577.

Carlson, Stephen C. “Comments on the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” TC 20 (2015): 1–2. http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v20/TC-2015-CBGM-Carlson.pdf.

Carlson, Stephen C. The Text of Galatians and Its History. WUNT II 385. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.

Do, Toan. “Mόνον or μονῶν? Reading 1John 2:2c from the Editio Critica Maior.” JBL 133, no. 3 (2014): 603–625.

Elliott, J.K. “Changes to the Exegesis of the Catholic Epistles in the Light of the Text in the Editio Critica Maior.” In History and Exegesis in Honor of Dr. Earle E. Ellis, edited by Sang-Won Son, 324–339. New York: T&T Clark, 2006.

Elliott, J.K. “Novum Testamentum Graecum.” ThLZ 131, no. 11 (2006): 1156–1159.

Elliott, J.K. “Review of Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior (2nd Edition).” JTS 64, no. 2 (2013): 636–642.

Elliott, J.K. “The Editio Critica Maior: One Reader’s Reactions.” In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism: New Testament, Other Early Christian and Jewish Literature: Papers Read at a Noster Conference in Münster, January 4–6, 2001, 129–144. Studies in Theology and Religion 8. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, 2003.

Epp, Eldon J. “Critical Editions and the Development of Text-critical Methods, Part 2: From Lachmann (1831) to the Present.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible: From 1750 to the Present, edited by John Riches, vol. 4, 13–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Epp, Eldon J. “In the Beginning Was the New Testament Text, but Which Text? A Consideration of ‘Ausgangstext’ and ‘Initial Text’” In Texts and Traditions: Essays in Honour of J. Keith Elliott, edited by Peter Doble and Jeffrey Kloha, 35–70. NTTSD 47. Leiden: Brill, 2014.

Epp, Eldon J. “Textual Clusters: Their Past and Future in New Testament Textual Criticism.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 519–577. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Gäbel, Georg, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, Holger Strutwolf, and Klaus Wachtel. “The CBGM Applied to Variants from Acts: Methodological Background.” TC 20 (2015): 1–3.

Gurry, Peter J. A Critical Examination of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method in New Testament Textual Criticism. NTTSD 55. Leiden: Brill, 2017.

Gurry, Peter J. “How Your Greek NT Is Changing: A Simple Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM).” JETS 59, no. 4 (2016): 675–689.

Head, Peter M. “Editio Critica Maior: An Introduction and Assessment.” TynB 61, no. 1 (2010): 131–152.

Holmes, Michael W. “From ‘Original Text’ to ‘Initial Text’: The Traditional Goal of New Testament Textual Criticism in Contemporary Discussion.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 637–688. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Holmes, Michael W. “What Text Is Being Edited? The Editing of the New Testament.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith N. Newman, 91–122. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.

Holmes, Michael W. “Working with an Open Textual Tradition: Challenges in Theory and Practice.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 65–78. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.

Houghton, H.A.G., and Catherine J. Smith. “Digital Editing and the Greek New Testament.” In Ancient Worlds in Digital Culture, edited by Claire Clivaz, Paul Dilley, and Hamidović David, 110–127. Digital Biblical Studies 1. Leiden: Brill, 2016.

Hüffmeier, Annette. “The CBGM Applied to Variants from Acts.” TC 20 (2015): 1–12.

Kloha, Jeffrey. “Theological and Hermeneutical Reflections on the Ongoing Revisions of the Novum Testamentum Graece.” In Listening to the Word of God: Exegetical Approaches, edited by Achim Behrens and Jorg Christian Salzmann, 169–206. Oberurseler Hefte Ergänzungsband 16. Göttingen: Edition Ruprecht, 2016.

Lin, Yii-Jan. The Erotic Life of Manuscripts: New Testament Textual Criticism and the Biological Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Mink, Gerd. “Contamination, Coherence, and Coincidence in Textual Transmission: The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM) as a Complement and Corrective to Existing Approaches.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 141–216. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.

Mink, Gerd. “Editing and Genealogical Studies: The New Testament.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15, no. 1 (2000): 51–56.

Mink, Gerd. “Eine umfassende Genealogie der neutestamentlichen Überlieferung.” NTS 39, no. 4 (1993): 481–499.

Mink, Gerd. “Guide to ‘Genealogical Queries’ (Version 2.0),” Münster: INTF, 2013. http://INTF.uni-muenster.de/cbgm2/guide_en.html.

Mink, Gerd. “Problems of a Highly Contaminated Tradition: The New Testament: Stemmata of Variants as a Source of a Genealogy for Witnesses.” In Studies in Stemmatology II, edited by Pieter van Reenen, August den Hollander, and Margot van Mulken, 13–85. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.

Mink, Gerd. “Some Notes on Dirk Jongkind’s Paper ‘Textual Criticism of the New Testament and the Coherence Based Genealogical Method: Some Critical Remarks,’” 1–12. Paper presented at INTF colloquium. Münster, January 27, 2014.

Mink, Gerd. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method—What Is It About?,” Münster: INTF, 2002. http://egora.uni-muenster.de/INTF/projekte/gsm_aus_en.shtml.

Mink, Gerd. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, CBGM: Introductory Presentation.” Münster: INTF, 2009. http://www.uni-muenster.de/INTF/cbgm_presentation/download.html.

Mink, Gerd. “Towards Computer-Assisted Textual Research.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1985 bis 1987, 63–70. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1988.

Mink, Gerd. “Was verändert sich in der Textkritik durch die Beachtung genealogischer Kohärenz?” In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism: New Testament, Other Early Christian and Jewish Literature: Papers Read at a Noster Conference in Münster, January 4–6, 2001, edited by Wim Weren and Dietrich-Alex Koch, 39–68. Studies in Theology and Religion 8. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, 2003.

Mink, Gerd. “Zur Stemmatisierung neutestamentlicher Handschriften.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1979 bis 1981, 100–114. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1982.

Parker, David C. An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Parker, David C. Textual Scholarship and the Making of the New Testament: The Lyell Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Paulson, Gregory S. “An Investigation of the Byzantine Text of the Johannine Epistles.” Review and Expositor 114 no. 4 (2017): 580-589.

Porter, Stanley E., and Andrew W. Pitts. Fundamentals of New Testament Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.

Rodgers, Peter R. “Review of The Textual History of the Greek New Testament.” NovT 54, no. 4 (2012): 396–398.

Schmid, Ulrich. “Genealogy by Chance! On the Significance of Accidental Variation.” In Studies in Stemmatology II, edited by P. van Reenen, A. den Hollander, and Margot van Mulken, 127–143. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.

Spencer, Matthew, Klaus Wachtel, and Christopher J. Howe. “The Greek Vorlage of the Syra Harclensis: A Comparative Study on Method in Exploring Textual Genealogy.” TC 7 (2002). http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v07/SWH2002/.

Strutwolf, Holger. “Original Text and Textual History.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 23–41. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.

Strutwolf, Holger. “Scribal Practices and the Transmission of Biblical Texts: New Insights from the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith H. Newman, 139–160. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.

Strutwolf, Holger. “Der Text der Apostelgeschichte bei Irenäus von Lyon und der sogenannte ‘Westliche Text’.” Pages 149–185 in ECM III/3. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2017.

Trovato, Paolo. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lachmann’s Method: A Non-Standard Handbook of Genealogical Textual Criticism in the Age of Post-Structuralism, Cladistics, and Copy-Text. Storie e linguaggi. Padova: Libreriauniversitaria.it, 2014.

Troxel, Ronald L. “What is the ‘Text’ in Textual Criticism?” Vetus Testamentum 66, no. 4 (2016): 603–626.

Wachtel, Klaus. “The Coherence Method and History.” TC 20 (2015): 1–6.

Wachtel, Klaus. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method: A New Way to Reconstruct the Text of the Greek New Testament.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith H. Newman, 123–138. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.

Wachtel, Klaus. “Conclusions.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 217–226. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.

Wachtel, Klaus. “The Corrected New Testament Text of Codex Sinaiticus.” In Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript, edited by Scot McKendrick, David C. Parker, Amy Myshrall, and Cillian O’Hogan, 97–106. London: British Library, 2015.

Wachtel, Klaus. “Editing the Greek New Testament on the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15, no. 1 (2000): 43–50.

Wachtel, Klaus. “Towards a Redefinition of External Criteria: The Role of Coherence in Assessing the Origin of Variants.” In Textual Variation: Theological and Social Tendencies? Papers from the Fifth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament, edited by David C. Parker and H.A.G. Houghton, 109–127. Texts and Studies Third Series 6. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2008.

Wasserman, Tommy. “Criteria for Evaluating Readings in New Testament Textual Criticism.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 579–612. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Wasserman, Tommy. “Historical and Philological Correlations and the CBGM as Applied to Mark 1:1.” TC 20 (2015): 1–11.

Wasserman, Tommy. “The Coherence Based Genealogical Method as a Tool for Explaining Textual Changes in the Greek New Testament.” NovT 57, no. 2 (2015): 206–218.

Wasserman, Tommy. The Epistle of Jude: Its Text and Transmission. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2006.

Wasserman, Tommy. Review of Bengt Alexandersson, Problems in the New Testament: Old Manuscripts and Papyri, the New Genealogical Method (CBGM) and the Editio Critica Maior (ECM) Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift, 2016.

Wasserman, Tommy and Peter J. Gurry. A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method. RBS 80. Atlanta: SBL, 2017.

Welsby, Alison. A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. ANTF 45. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Welsby, Alison. A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. ANTF 45. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.

Long assessments (post 2017)

Short descriptions (post 2017)