The following are publications on and interactions with the CBGM, with some overlap with essays on the ECM. Criterion for inclusion in the list below is at least a paragraph of discussion of the CBGM. The following publications may be divided into three categories. (1) Those written in 2017 or prior. ECM Acts was published in 2017 which used a new CBGM interface, and Tommy Wasserman and Peter Gurry’s A New Approach, was also published in 2017. Since then, there has been more clarification on how the method works. (2) Those that present extended analyses evaluating the CBGM or applying it in the author’s assessment of witnesses. (3) Those that offer only a relatively brief description of the CBGM without extensive critical engagement.
- -2017 and Prior
- -Long assessments of (or using) the CBGM (post 2017)
- -Short descriptive works (post 2017)
2017 and Prior
Aland, Barbara. “A New Instrument and Method for Evaluating the Total Manuscript Tradition of the New Testament.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1985 bis 1987, 33–50. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1988.
Aland, Barbara. “Welche Rolle spielen Textkritik und Textgeschichte für das Verständnis des Neuen Testaments? Frühe Leserperspektiven.” NTS 52, no. 3 (2006): 303–318.
Alexanderson, Bengt. Problems in the New Testament: Old Manuscripts and Papyri, the New Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM) and the Editio Critica Maior (ECM). Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum et Litterarum Gothoburgensis, Humaniora 48. Göteborg: Göteborg, 2014.
Blumenthal, Christian. “Es wird aber kommen der Tag des Herrn”: Eine textkritische Studie zu 2Petr 3,10. Bonner Biblische Beiträge 154. Hamburg: Philo, 2007.
Bordalejo, Barbara. “The Genealogy of Texts: Manuscript Traditions and Textual Traditions.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities31, no. 3 (2016): 563–577.
Carlson, Stephen C. “Comments on the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” TC 20 (2015): 1–2. http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v20/TC-2015-CBGM-Carlson.pdf.
Carlson, Stephen C. The Text of Galatians and Its History. WUNT II 385. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.
Do, Toan. “Mόνον or μονῶν? Reading 1John 2:2c from the Editio Critica Maior.” JBL 133, no. 3 (2014): 603–625.
Elliott, J.K. “Changes to the Exegesis of the Catholic Epistles in the Light of the Text in the Editio Critica Maior.” In History and Exegesis in Honor of Dr. Earle E. Ellis, edited by Sang-Won Son, 324–339. New York: T&T Clark, 2006.
Elliott, J.K. “Novum Testamentum Graecum.” ThLZ 131, no. 11 (2006): 1156–1159.
Elliott, J.K. “Review of Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior (2nd Edition).” JTS 64, no. 2 (2013): 636–642.
Elliott, J.K. “The Editio Critica Maior: One Reader’s Reactions.” In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism: New Testament, Other Early Christian and Jewish Literature: Papers Read at a Noster Conference in Münster, January 4–6, 2001, 129–144. Studies in Theology and Religion 8. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, 2003.
Epp, Eldon J. “Critical Editions and the Development of Text-critical Methods, Part 2: From Lachmann (1831) to the Present.” In The New Cambridge History of the Bible: From 1750 to the Present, edited by John Riches, vol. 4, 13–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Epp, Eldon J. “In the Beginning Was the New Testament Text, but Which Text? A Consideration of ‘Ausgangstext’ and ‘Initial Text’” In Texts and Traditions: Essays in Honour of J. Keith Elliott, edited by Peter Doble and Jeffrey Kloha, 35–70. NTTSD 47. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Epp, Eldon J. “Textual Clusters: Their Past and Future in New Testament Textual Criticism.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 519–577. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Gäbel, Georg, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, Holger Strutwolf, and Klaus Wachtel. “The CBGM Applied to Variants from Acts: Methodological Background.” TC 20 (2015): 1–3.
Gurry, Peter J. A Critical Examination of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method in New Testament Textual Criticism. NTTSD 55. Leiden: Brill, 2017.
Gurry, Peter J. “How Your Greek NT Is Changing: A Simple Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM).” JETS 59, no. 4 (2016): 675–689.
Head, Peter M. “Editio Critica Maior: An Introduction and Assessment.” TynB 61, no. 1 (2010): 131–152.
Holmes, Michael W. “From ‘Original Text’ to ‘Initial Text’: The Traditional Goal of New Testament Textual Criticism in Contemporary Discussion.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 637–688. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Holmes, Michael W. “What Text Is Being Edited? The Editing of the New Testament.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith N. Newman, 91–122. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.
Holmes, Michael W. “Working with an Open Textual Tradition: Challenges in Theory and Practice.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 65–78. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Houghton, H.A.G., and Catherine J. Smith. “Digital Editing and the Greek New Testament.” In Ancient Worlds in Digital Culture, edited by Claire Clivaz, Paul Dilley, and Hamidović David, 110–127. Digital Biblical Studies 1. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
Hüffmeier, Annette. “The CBGM Applied to Variants from Acts.” TC 20 (2015): 1–12.
Kloha, Jeffrey. “Theological and Hermeneutical Reflections on the Ongoing Revisions of the Novum Testamentum Graece.” In Listening to the Word of God: Exegetical Approaches, edited by Achim Behrens and Jorg Christian Salzmann, 169–206. Oberurseler Hefte Ergänzungsband 16. Göttingen: Edition Ruprecht, 2016.
Lin, Yii-Jan. The Erotic Life of Manuscripts: New Testament Textual Criticism and the Biological Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Mink, Gerd. “Contamination, Coherence, and Coincidence in Textual Transmission: The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM) as a Complement and Corrective to Existing Approaches.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 141–216. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Mink, Gerd. “Editing and Genealogical Studies: The New Testament.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15, no. 1 (2000): 51–56.
Mink, Gerd. “Eine umfassende Genealogie der neutestamentlichen Überlieferung.” NTS 39, no. 4 (1993): 481–499.
Mink, Gerd. “Guide to ‘Genealogical Queries’ (Version 2.0),” Münster: INTF, 2013. http://INTF.uni-muenster.de/cbgm2/guide_en.html.
Mink, Gerd. “Problems of a Highly Contaminated Tradition: The New Testament: Stemmata of Variants as a Source of a Genealogy for Witnesses.” In Studies in Stemmatology II, edited by Pieter van Reenen, August den Hollander, and Margot van Mulken, 13–85. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.
Mink, Gerd. “Some Notes on Dirk Jongkind’s Paper ‘Textual Criticism of the New Testament and the Coherence Based Genealogical Method: Some Critical Remarks,’” 1–12. Paper presented at INTF colloquium. Münster, January 27, 2014.
Mink, Gerd. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method—What Is It About?,” Münster: INTF, 2002. http://egora.uni-muenster.de/INTF/projekte/gsm_aus_en.shtml.
Mink, Gerd. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, CBGM: Introductory Presentation.” Münster: INTF, 2009. http://www.uni-muenster.de/INTF/cbgm_presentation/download.html.
Mink, Gerd. “Towards Computer-Assisted Textual Research.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1985 bis 1987, 63–70. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1988.
Mink, Gerd. “Was verändert sich in der Textkritik durch die Beachtung genealogischer Kohärenz?” In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism: New Testament, Other Early Christian and Jewish Literature: Papers Read at a Noster Conference in Münster, January 4–6, 2001, edited by Wim Weren and Dietrich-Alex Koch, 39–68. Studies in Theology and Religion 8. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, 2003.
Mink, Gerd. “Zur Stemmatisierung neutestamentlicher Handschriften.” In Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1979 bis 1981, 100–114. Münster: Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung, 1982.
Parker, David C. An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Parker, David C. Textual Scholarship and the Making of the New Testament: The Lyell Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Paulson, Gregory S. “An Investigation of the Byzantine Text of the Johannine Epistles.” Review and Expositor 114 no. 4 (2017): 580-589.
Porter, Stanley E., and Andrew W. Pitts. Fundamentals of New Testament Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.
Rodgers, Peter R. “Review of The Textual History of the Greek New Testament.” NovT 54, no. 4 (2012): 396–398.
Schmid, Ulrich. “Genealogy by Chance! On the Significance of Accidental Variation.” In Studies in Stemmatology II, edited by P. van Reenen, A. den Hollander, and Margot van Mulken, 127–143. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.
Spencer, Matthew, Klaus Wachtel, and Christopher J. Howe. “The Greek Vorlage of the Syra Harclensis: A Comparative Study on Method in Exploring Textual Genealogy.” TC 7 (2002). http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v07/SWH2002/.
Strutwolf, Holger. “Original Text and Textual History.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 23–41. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Strutwolf, Holger. “Scribal Practices and the Transmission of Biblical Texts: New Insights from the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith H. Newman, 139–160. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.
Strutwolf, Holger. “Der Text der Apostelgeschichte bei Irenäus von Lyon und der sogenannte ‘Westliche Text’.” Pages 149–185 in ECM III/3. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2017.
Trovato, Paolo. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lachmann’s Method: A Non-Standard Handbook of Genealogical Textual Criticism in the Age of Post-Structuralism, Cladistics, and Copy-Text. Storie e linguaggi. Padova: Libreriauniversitaria.it, 2014.
Troxel, Ronald L. “What is the ‘Text’ in Textual Criticism?” Vetus Testamentum 66, no. 4 (2016): 603–626.
Wachtel, Klaus. “The Coherence Method and History.” TC 20 (2015): 1–6.
Wachtel, Klaus. “The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method: A New Way to Reconstruct the Text of the Greek New Testament.” In Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present, edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Judith H. Newman, 123–138. Resources for Biblical Study 69. Atlanta: SBL, 2012.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Conclusions.” In The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes, 217–226. Text-Critical Studies 8. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Wachtel, Klaus. “The Corrected New Testament Text of Codex Sinaiticus.” In Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript, edited by Scot McKendrick, David C. Parker, Amy Myshrall, and Cillian O’Hogan, 97–106. London: British Library, 2015.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Editing the Greek New Testament on the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15, no. 1 (2000): 43–50.
Wachtel, Klaus. “On the Relationship of the ‘Western Text’ and the Byzantine Tradition of Acts—A Plea Against the Text-Type Concept.” Pages 137–148 in ECM III/3. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2017.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Text-Critical Commentary.” Pages 1–38 in ECM III/3. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2017.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Towards a Redefinition of External Criteria: The Role of Coherence in Assessing the Origin of Variants.” In Textual Variation: Theological and Social Tendencies? Papers from the Fifth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament, edited by David C. Parker and H.A.G. Houghton, 109–127. Texts and Studies Third Series 6. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2008.
Wasserman, Tommy. “Criteria for Evaluating Readings in New Testament Textual Criticism.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes, 2nd ed., 579–612. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Wasserman, Tommy. “Historical and Philological Correlations and the CBGM as Applied to Mark 1:1.” TC 20 (2015): 1–11.
Wasserman, Tommy. “The Coherence Based Genealogical Method as a Tool for Explaining Textual Changes in the Greek New Testament.” NovT 57, no. 2 (2015): 206–218.
Wasserman, Tommy. The Epistle of Jude: Its Text and Transmission. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2006.
Wasserman, Tommy. Review of Bengt Alexandersson, Problems in the New Testament: Old Manuscripts and Papyri, the New Genealogical Method (CBGM) and the Editio Critica Maior (ECM) Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift, 2016.
Wasserman, Tommy and Peter J. Gurry. A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method. RBS 80. Atlanta: SBL, 2017.
Welsby, Alison. A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. ANTF 45. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Welsby, Alison. A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. ANTF 45. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.
Long assessments (post 2017)
Alexanderson, Bengt. Review of Tommy Wasserman, Peter J. Gurry, A New Approach to Textual Criticism. An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method. Gnomon 91 no. 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17104/0017-1417-2019-7-596
Al-Suadi, Soham and Frank Krüger. “Redaktionskritik Reconsidered.” Pages 109-130, in Biblical Texts in Digitalization: Towards Critical Digital Biblical Studies. Edited by Soham Al-Suadi and Gotlind Ulshöfer. Tübingen: University of Tübingen Press, 2021.
Carlson, Stephen C. “A Bias at the Heart of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM).” JBL 139 no. 2 (2020): 319-340. (Response by Mink 2020)
Castelli, Silvia. Johann Jakob Wettstein’s Principles for New Testament Textual Criticism A Fight for Scholarly Freedom. NTTSD 62. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
Edmondson, Andrew Charles. “An Analysis of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method Using Phylogenetics.” University of Birmingham, PhD diss., 2019. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/9150/
Elliott, J.K. “Thoroughgoing Eclectic Textual Criticism: Manuscripts and Variants of Revelation.” Pages 363-377 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship From H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Foster, Paul. “A Comparison of Metzger’s Category {D} Readings With the Textual Decisions of the Editio Critica Maior.” Pages 47-62 in Die Bibel zum Sprechen Bringen: Festschrift zu Ehren von Holger Strutwolf. Edited by Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Jan Graefe. ANTF 61. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.
Gäbel, Georg. “‘Western Text,’ ‘D-Text Cluster,’ Bezan Trajectory,’ or What Else?” Pages 83–136 in ECM III/3. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2017.
Griffitts, Troy. “Software for the Collaborative Editing of the Greek New Testament.” PhD diss. University of Birmingham, 2017.
Gurry, Peter J. “The Byzantine Text as the Initial Text.” Pages 309-324 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Gurry, Peter J. “Text-Types and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” Pages 446-462 in The Oxford Handbook of Textual Criticism of the Bible. Edited by Sidnie White Crawford and Tommy Wasserman. Oxford: University Press, 2025.
Gurry, Peter J. and Tommy Wasserman. “Textual Criticism and the Editio Critica Maior of James.” Pages 209–229 in Reading the Epistle of James: A Resource for Students. Edited by Eric F. Mason and Darian R. Lockett. Atlanta: SBL, 2019.
Holmes, Michael W. “The ‘Western’ Text of Acts: A Challenge for Historians.” Pages 3-22 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Hüffmeier, Annette. “Apparatus Construction: Philological Methodology and Technical Realization.” Pages 447-459 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship from H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Hüffmeier, Annette and Gregory S. Paulson. “Critical Editions of the Greek New Testament from the Twentieth to Twenty-First Century.” Pages 657-687 in The Oxford Handbook of Textual Criticism of the Bible. Edited by Sidnie White Crawford and Tommy Wasserman. Oxford: University Press, 2025.
Hyytiäinen, Pasi. “Evolving Gamaliel Tradition in Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis, Acts 5:38–39: A Novel Application of Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM).” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 24 (2019): 1–22.
Hyytiäinen, Pasi. “A New Method in Establishing Quantitative Relationships between Manuscripts of the New Testament.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (2022).
Knight, Jarrett W. “Reading between the Lines: 1 Peter 4:16, MS 424, and Some Methodological Blind Spots in the CBGM.” JBL 138 no. 4 (2019): 899-921.
Lakmann, Marie-Luise. “Familie 13: Die Besonderheiten der Untergruppe 983 und 1689 im Markusevangelium.” Pages 54–75 in ECM I.2. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 2021.
McCollum, Joey. “The CBGM: An Illustrated Crash Course. Supplement to ‘The open-cbgm Library: Design and Demonstration’.” SBL 2020 presentation and supplement.
McCollum, Joey. “Open source CBGM.” https://github.com/jjmccollum/open-cbgm
Mink, Gerd. “Manuscripts, Texts, History, and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM): Some Thoughts and Clarifications.” Pages 281-294 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Mink, Gerd. “The Necessity of Construction Global Stemmata.” Pages 575-588 in Die Bibel zum Sprechen Bringen: Festschrift zu Ehren von Holger Strutwolf. Edited by Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Jan Graefe. ANTF 61. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.
Mink, Gerd. “Remarks on Carlson, ‘A Bias at the Heart of the CBGM’.” 2020. blogpost: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/intfblog/-/blogs/1429909
Parker, D.C. “Family 1 in the Gospel of John: Its Members, Text and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” Pages 325-342 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Pastorelli, David. “La cohérence généalogique dans la Coherence-Based Genealogical Method: Évaluation critique.” Pages 109–138 in Traditions et Traductions des textes bibliques: Études de critique textuelle et d’exégèse en l’honneur de Christian-Bernard Amphoux à l’occasion de son 80e anniversaire. Edited by Laurent Pinchard and Jean-Claude Haelewyck. LCA 35. Brussels: Éditions Safran (2023).
Pastorelli, David. “La mise en œuvre de la cohérence pré-généalogique dans le cadre de la Coherence-Based Genealogical Method : évaluation critique.” BABELAO 10-11 (2022): 169-188.
Pastorelli, David. “A Response to a Recent Publication on the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” Filología Neotestamentaria XXXV (2022).
Paulson, Gregory S. “Byzantine Lectionary Manuscripts and Their Significance for Biblical Textual Criticism.” Pages 112–132 in The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity. Edited by Eugen J. Pentiuc. Oxford: University Press, 2022.
Paulson, Gregory S. “Improving the CBGM: Recent Interactions.” Pages 295-308 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Paulson, Gregory S. and Brice C. Jones. “Resurrecting Amulets and Ostraca within New Testament Textual Criticism.” JBL 142.4 (2023): 633-655.
Pessoa da Silva Pinto, Leonardo. “The CBGM and Lachmannian Textual Criticism.” TC 27 (2022): 17–31. < http://jbtc.org/v27/TC-2022_daSilvaPinto.pdf>
Pessoa da Silva Pinto, Leonardo. “The Septuagint of Samuel and the CBGM.” Pages 589-615 in Die Bibel zum Sprechen Bringen: Festschrift zu Ehren von Holger Strutwolf. Edited by Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Jan Graefe. ANTF 61. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.
Quarles, Charles L. New Testament Textual Criticism for the 21st Century: A Practical Guide. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2025.
Quarles, Charles L. “The Usefulness of Pre-Genealogical Coherence for Detecting Multiple Emergence and Coincidental Agreement: Matthew 16.2b–3 as a Test Case.” NTS 67 (2021): 424–446.
Shah, Abidan Paul Shah. Changing the Goalpost of New Testament Textual Criticism. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2020.
Shively, Elizabeth E. “New Testament Textual Criticism and Exegesis.” Pages 624-636 in The Oxford Handbook of Textual Criticism of the Bible. Edited by Sidnie White Crawford and Tommy Wasserman. Oxford: University Press, 2025.
Smith, Andrew. “Examining A Critical Examination of the CBGM: A Review Article.” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 24 (2019).
Stanojević, Jovan. Orthodox New Testament Textual Scholarship: Antoniades, Lectionaries, and the Catholic Epistles. T&S 26. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2021.
Stevens, Chris. History of the Pauline Corpus in Texts, Transmissions and Trajectories: A Textual Analysis of Manuscripts from the Second to the Fifth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2020. [esp. pp. 37–40.]
Strutwolf, Holger. “Direct Copies as Test Case for the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM)? The Example of E 08 and 1884.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 43–59.
Strutwolf, Holger. “Die Editio Critica Maior des griechischen Neuen Testaments—Editionsprinzipien, Editionstechnik und Digital Humanities.” ZAC 24.1 (2020): 60-108.
Strutwolf, Holger. “Von de Kanones der Textkritik zu einer Theorie der Variantenentstehung im Rahmen der Kohärenzbasierten Genealogischen Methode. Einige vorläufige Überlegungen.” Pages 265-280 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Strutwolf, Holger, Gregory S. Paulson, and Klaus Wachtel. “Text-Critical Commentary.” Pages 8–34 in ECM I.2. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: Germany Bible Society, 2021.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Die kohärenzbasierte Methode und ihre Ergebnisse für die neutestamentliche Textgeschichte.” BN 184 (2020): 43–72.
Wachtel, Klaus. “The Development of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM), its Place in Textual Scholarship, and Digital Editing.” Pages 435-446 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship from H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Elements of a Global Stemma for the Gospel of Mark: On the Construction of Optimal Substemmata.” Pages 615-634 in Die Bibel zum Sprechen Bringen: Festschrift zu Ehren von Holger Strutwolf. Edited by Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Jan Graefe. ANTF 61. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2025.
Wachtel, Klaus. “Notes on the Text of Mark.” Pages 1–7 in ECM I.2. Edited by Holger Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Marie-Luise Lakmann, Gregory S. Paulson, and Klaus Wachtel. Stuttgart: Germany Bible Society, 2021.
Wasserman, Tommy. “Criteria for the Assessment of Readings in New Testament Textual Criticism.” Pages 571-599 in The Oxford Handbook of Textual Criticism of the Bible. Edited by Sidnie White Crawford and Tommy Wasserman. Oxford: University Press, 2025.
Wasserman, Tommy. “Methods of Evaluating Textual Relationships: From Bengel to the CBGM and Beyond.” Pages 333-361 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship from H.C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Whidden, Matthew. “Revisiting GA 205 and 2886 in the Gospel of Mark: History, Reception, and Text.” TC 30 (2025): 109–125.
Short descriptions (post 2017)
Al-Suadi, Soham. “Historical Critical Exegesis and the Reappraisal of the Beginnings of Christianity in the Digital Age.” Pages 51–78, especially 69–70 in Biblical Texts in Digitalization: Towards Critical Digital Biblical Studies. Edited by Soham Al-Suadi and Gotlind Ulshöfer. Tübingen: University of Tübingen Press, 2021.
Bryan, Steven M. “Scribal Tendencies and Name Forms: ‘Mary’ in the New Testament.” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 26 (2021): 155–186.
Crisp, Simon. “Past and Current Trends in New Testament Textual Criticism.” Pages 133–45 in The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity. Edited by Eugen J. Pentiuc. Oxford: University Press, 2022.
Dormandy, Michael. Building a Book of Books: Textual Characteristics of the Early Greek Majuscule Pandects. ANTF 54. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2024.
Elliott, J.K. “The Editio Critica Maior Edition of Mark.” Pages 71–76 in Traditions et Traductions des textes bibliques: Ètudes de critique textuelle et d’exégèse en l’honneur de Christian-Bernard Amphoux à l’occasion de son 80e anniversaire. Edited by Laurent Pinchard and Jean-Claude Haelewyck. LCA 35. Brussels: Èditions Safran (2023).
Elliott, J.K. “Recent Printed Editions of the Editio Critica Maior and Textual Criticism.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 21–31.
Elliott, J.K. Review of ECM Acts. Theologische Literaturzeitung 143.12 (2018): 1274–6.
Elliott, J.K. “Textual Criticism.” Filología Neotestamentaria 33 (2020): 3-8.
Heikkilä, Tuomas. “Dealing with Open Textual Traditions.” Pages 254-272 in Handbook of Stemmatology: History, Methodology, Digital Approaches. Edited by Philipp Roelli. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Hixson, Elijah. Scribal Habits in Sixth-Century Greek Purple Codices. NTTSD 61. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Hoenen, Armin. “History of Computer-Assisted Stemmatology.” Pages 294-303 in Handbook of Stemmatology: History, Methodology, Digital Approaches. Edited by Philipp Roelli. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Holladay, Carl R. “ECM Acts and the New Testament Exegete.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 32–42.
Holmes, Michael W. “New Testament Textual Criticism in 2020: A (Selective) Survey of the Status Quaestionis.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 3–20.
Houghton, H.A.G. “An Initial Selection of Manuscripts for the Editio Critica Maior of the Pauline Epistles.” Pages 343-360 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Houghton, H.A.G. “The Practice of New Testament Textual Criticism in the Twenty- First Century.” Pages 373-394 in The Oxford Handbook of Textual Criticism of the Bible. Edited by Sidnie White Crawford and Tommy Wasserman. Oxford: University Press, 2025.
Houghton, H.A.G. and Catherine Smith. “Digital Editing and the Greek New Testament.” Pages 110–127 in Ancient World in Digital Culture. Edited by Claire Clivaz, Paul Dilley, and David Hamidović. Digital Biblical Studies. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
Houghton, H.A.G., D.C. Parker, Peter Robinson, and Klaus Wachtel. “The Editio Critica Maior of the Greek New Testament: Twenty Years of Digital Collaboration.” Early Christianity 11 (2020): 97–117.
Hüffmeier, Annette. “GA 382: Byzantinisches ‘Allerlei’.” Pages 109-122 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Hyytiäinen, Pasi. “The Changing Text of Acts: A Phylogenetic Approach.” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 26 (2021): 1–28.
Knust, Jennifer Wright. “Editing without Interpreting: The Museum of the Bible and New Testament Textual Criticism.” Pages 145–170 in The Museum of the Bible: A Critical Introduction. Edited by Jill Hicks-Keeton and Cavan Concannon. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019.
Knust, Jennifer Wright. “Textual Nostalgia Revisited.” Pages 96-101 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship From H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Landefeld, Katrin Maria. “The Significance of Corrections for the Examination of the Emergence of Variants.” NTS 68 (2022): 418–30.
Lanier, Gregory R. “Quantifying New Testament Textual Variants: Key Witnesses in Acts and the Catholic Letters.” NTS 64 no. 4 (2018): 551–572.
Lanier, Gregory R. “Taking Inventory on the ‘Age of the Minuscule’: Later Manuscripts and the Byzantine Tradition within the Field of Textual Criticism.” CBR 16 no. 3 (2018): 263–308.
Müller, Darius. “Die mehrheitsbildenden Gruppen der Apokalypse-Überlieferung: Textgeschichtliche und editorische Herausforderungen.” Pages 385-400 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Peterson, Jacob W. “GA 1739: A Monk, His Manuscript, and the Text of Paul’s Letters.” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 2020.
Porter, Stanley E. “The Domains of Textual Criticism and the Future of Textual Scholarship.” Pages 131-153 in The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship from H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Edited by Garrick V. Allen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Roos, Teemu. “Computational Construction of Trees.” Pages 315-327 in Handbook of Stemmatology: History, Methodology, Digital Approaches. Edited by Philipp Roelli. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Shaw, Frank. “Three Developments in New Testament Textual Criticism: Wettlaufer, Houghton and Jongkind (-Williams).” JGRChJ 14 (2018): 89–129.
Shively, Elizabeth E. Review of ECM Mark. RBL 2024.
Wasserman, Tommy. “New Traces of an Old Text: The Corrections of Gregory-Aland 424 in Acts 1-14.” Pages 51-68 in The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Edited by H.A.G. Houghton, David C. Parker, and Holger Strutwolf. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.